Why the arts is better than science Essay Example For Students

Why the arts is better than science Essay Why the arts is better than science Creativity cannot be taught. People use their own individual talents. Feelings and emotions can be expressive Different life experiences and the varying perspectives people have. Art gives us what makes us truly special. What it means to be a human. We have to found ways of expressing ourselves; Otherwise we just become clones of each other. Subjectivity plays a large role here as that the fact everybody appreciates science and What it does to benefit us means it is lacking spirituality. Science theories and their truths are objective. In the past they have been wrong. Therefore they can be proved wrong. However art cannot be. E. G. Scientists may one day discover our theory of gravity to be incorrect, but nobody can ever say that Ad Vines Last Supper needed a little more red. There is only so much that science can discover about our world; there are limits to the exploration of science because it is bound by number and formulae. They just build upon what is already known, But the arts have no limits; only that of imagination. We will write a custom essay on Why the arts is better than science specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now Science is a race to see who can discover the most first. Art is individual because nobody can steal your work or ideas; even it they tried it would NEVER be identical to what you could produce. Therefore it expresses freedom and individuality Art is just as constructive as science. Even in our early primitive years we used cave paintings, for example, to express our opinions, describe and try to explain the world we live in, Art came long before science- foundation of our expression. A musician, dancer or painter must also learn technique, sometimes as rigorously, for such a lengthy period of time, and as precisely as any scientist. The difference is, that they take vatu they have learnt and build upon the foundations of this technique to form individuality unparalleled with science. Art can be a form of protest. For example animal farm, George Orwell wrote about animals however it actually represented the Communism in the USSR. Art can be interpreted individually. We have to kick further than the paper, for example always analyzing poems and novels in English, or trying to explore deeper into the emotions and sub ideas a choreographer was trying to portray in a dance. This therefore, opens up discussion and generates deeper thinking amongst our society so we become more enriched people. Although the arts do not solve problems like science, they connect the inner expressions of artists with the outside world; ready for our own interpretation.

Labor Day A Holiday for Workers Everywhere!

Labor Day A Holiday for Workers Everywhere! Happy Labor Day weekend! This weekend, the United States and Canada commemorate the contribution of workers to society- your daily efforts, all you produce, and how you bolster the country’s economy. That likely includes you, so that means this holiday is yours to celebrate. What is Labor Day?Aside from the obvious fact that all hard work deserves a day off in its honor, Labor Day originated when groups of people around the country took a stand to improve their horrible working environments.The first Labor Day took place in 1882 in New York City. It was the height of the Industrial Revolution, and many Americans- including young children- were working 12 hours a day, 7 days a week, just to have the basics.The hours were long, the conditions were unsafe, and the pay was low. Faced with these terrible conditions and looking to protest, 10,000 workers met at City Hall and marched the streets- the first Labor Day parade in the country’s history.In the years that followed, o ther states adopted the trend, celebrating the importance of workers to a successful society.  Congress officially recognized the holiday in June of 1894 as the first Monday in September.Celebrating Work with†¦ RelaxationFor many, Labor Day is the unofficial end of summer- the last hurrah before kids go back to school, the temperatures begin to drop, and apples and pumpkins find their way into farmers’ markets.Soak up your long weekend of sunshine (fingers crossed rain isn’t on the agenda)! Pack a picnic, find a local parade, hit up the beach, or just enjoy time at home with your family and friends.And, if you’re lucky enough to have Monday off, enjoy your well-deserved break from all the hard work you do.

Supply Chain Management Issues in Boeing Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

Supply Chain Management Issues in Boeing - Essay Example This has also put all other stakeholders into serious problems. This paper presents an analysis of the supply chain of Boeing in the context of various facets of the management of the supply chain by the company. In response to A 380 airliner from its arch rival Boeing Corporation embarked on the manufacture of 'Boeing787 Dreamliner' a light weight model with seating capacity of 210 to 296 passengers. "The 787 Dreamliner is a family of new airplanes that promises to bring big-jet comfort and economics to the mid-size market. The Boeing 787 incorporates advanced materials, systems and engines to provide a 20% improvement in fuel performance on a per-passenger basis. The 787-8 Dreamliner will carry 210 to 250 passengers about 7,650 to 8,200 nautical miles and the 787-9 will carry 250 to 290 passengers about 8,000 to 8,500 nautical miles (Boeing Commercial Aerospace). The first delivery was scheduled for May 2008 which now has been pushed as far as the second quarter of 2009. With firm orders worth $ 144 billion the company has found serious issues with its global supply chain as a result of which the company has postponed the delivery of the airliner a number of times causing serious concerns to the major airlines that have placed orders with Boeing for this aircrafts. The production process of making the new aircraft with new light weight composite materials in itself is a challenge for the company. In addition the company has made drastic changes in its supply chain which eventually has hit the progress in the manufacture and delivery of Dreamliner. The way in which the company has organized its supply chain for 787 manufacturing has put a complicated way in which the supply chain partnering firms share risks and profits from the airliner. This implies that the financial burden will be put up and down on the firms in the chain as every company would like to protect their own financial interest. This would necessarily result in chaos in the short-term and considerable delays in the completion of the manufacture of the product which will make everyone in the line suffer. The real issue is Boeing attempted to use what appears to be an automotive product like production pr ocess in which all the parts and components in a pre-fabricated form are brought the assembly line. This has necessitated sections of the aircraft to be flown out of far off locations in Japan, Italy, South Carolina and Kansas to be assembled in Washington within a short time of as much as three days. Apart from this there are various other supply chain issues being faced by the company which are explored by this paper. Boeing and Supplier Quality Management Manufacture of Boeing 787 Dreamliner represents a complete shift in the manufacturing philosophy of Boeing Corporation as the company

Argument Against Wearing Uniforms in School Research Paper

Argument Against Wearing Uniforms in School - Research Paper Example These students, whose creative voices are stifled by the school by not allowing them to express themselves artistically in their mode of dress more often than not end up being the problem students who are under constant observation and meetings with guidance counselors and the school principal for being â€Å"problem students†. Courtney Williams (â€Å"Why Student's Shouldn't Have to Wear Uniforms†) who runs a petition site against her school's move to impose uniforms explained it best in the following statement:   Teenagers, these days, have such a great sense of their own unique style and they should be   able to show this but, schools are making us wear uniforms. How are we, as students, going to   express our style?   This is an argument supported by Alistair Endersby who explained in his argumentative paper (â€Å"Should School Uniforms Be Got Rid Of?†) that uniforms are a violation of a student's right to Freedom of Expression. He explains:   We a ll have a right to individuality, to make personal choices and to express our personality. This   right of   free expression includes the way we choose to dress. Making everyone wear the same   school uniform   infringes on (goes against) our rights and is a misuse of authority.

The movement of illegal Mexicans into Texas Essay Example for Free

The movement of illegal Mexicans into Texas Essay Mexicans entered the United States from the southern border into Texas. For the Mexicans to have preferred to leave their mother country there are factors that contributed to these immigrations. After the Second World War, America’s economy expanded therefore forcing American employers to get laborers from Mexico to replace those who had moved to the military and other well paying jobs, this was a temporary worker program that would allow Mexicans to stay for duration of nine months in a year. When this program came to an end-due to amendment of laws-employers started importing the Mexicans illegally, a factor that led to their influx in the region since it was now not illegal to hire the immigrants even without documentation. Revision of the immigration policies from a quota to a preference system was a major push factor, after the Second World War, America softened her stand on immigration since the quota system was viewed as promoting racism. This policy encouraged issuance of visas to immigrants per every foreign state, due to the bureaucratic process of acquiring visas, the immigrants got impatient to wait for years hence getting in illegally. Abject poverty and lack of employment were other factors that led to illegal immigration into Texas. Mexicans had a culture of maintaining close cultural ties with their relations, since most of them lived in small urban centers and rural areas, easy movement across the border still provided an ample opportunity for them to maintain these ties with their families. Poor management of the borders was largely highlighted in the media, this made the Mexicans take advantage of the crisis situation and settle in large numbers in Texas (LeMay, M. C 2007). Pull factors are those that attract immigrants to settle in a country, America experienced fast economic growth; this led to the sprouting of industries which by extension made Mexicans take advantage of the high labour opportunities and move to Texas. There was generally lower population in Texas as compared to Mexico, the government introduced amnesty efforts, poor enforcement of immigration policies and employers in Texas having taken employees illegally due to desperation. These are some of the factors that exacerbated the influx of immigrants in Texas (McDonald, J. J 2007).

Legalizing Drug Use Essay example -- Philosophy, Marx, Mill, Locke

The arguments that I have just laid out are not perfect and they have some apparent flaws that some philosophers would strongly disagree with, while there are other arguments that some of the great philosophers would agree with. I will critique the arguments that I have just laid out using the perspective of three different philosophers who all have their own ideas of how the state should function and the role of the citizen. The three philosophers that I will use in this critique will be Karl Marx, John Stewart Mill, and John Locke. The reason why I picked these three philosophers is because they all agree with some aspects of my writing, while disagreeing with others. One will disagree with the role of the state and the citizens, but agree with legalizing recreational drug use, while the other two will agree with the role of the state and citizens, but disagree with legalizing drug use. Karl Marx is the philosopher who would disagree with many of the arguments that I presented above. The reason why Marx would disagree with so many of my arguments is because he is a strong believer of the state being in charge of society and having complete control over the citizens. In the society that I created, it is largely a free society where the people are in charge of their actions and the government has a limited role in the daily transactions that are occurring between citizens. Marx would believe that in my society where there are different social classes, these classes would always be in a battle with one another and will be exploiting the lower class so they can make a bigger profit. In my society where the political economy is capitalism, there will be a wide variety of incomes. Some citizens will have more smarts, other... ...vious philosophers have showed that there are some minor critiques on my theory; however the general theories and principles are generally accepted and promoted in the writings of Marx, Mill, and Locke. Marx was the only one who would agree with the legalization of recreational drug use, while Mill and Locke would not have been in favor of it because of the harm it would likely cause to other people who would be involved by the use of these drugs. In regards to the function of the state, Mill and Locke would have agreed with my writing because the state is limited and the citizens are free to do as they wish as long as they do not interfere with other citizens rights. Marx would not have agreed with this because his philosophy of the state is communism. The three of these philosophers all agreed on certain aspects and disagreed on other aspects of my writing.

Morality of Abortion Essay

Introduction In this paper, I will argue that abortion is morally acceptable in certain situations. In defending this argument I will include the reason behind my decision, and I will provide an alternate example using the same general principle. After explaining my principle I will give clarity to two arguments that may be presented by others. Finally, I will conclude by describing any changes that I have made to my general principle. II. Argument 1.) If a person is in a situation in which she can prevent an individual from living a life of pain and suffering, then it is morally acceptable for her to do so. 2. ) In cases in which a mother is in a situation in which she can prevent her unborn child from living a life of pain and suffering, by having an abortion 3. ) Therefore, in this cases it is morally acceptable for a mother to have an abortion. III. Explanation Rule one states â€Å"an argument is good for you if and only if all of the premises are reasonable for you to believe. † For this rule I will use a similar situation with the same general principle. If Allison is a situation in which her favorite dog severely breaks his leg and can not be repaired, then it is morally acceptable for her to euthanize the dog. In this example it is morally acceptable to euthanize the dog because the dog will not be able to walk again and will suffer because it will not be able to move. Therefore, if a person is in a situation in which she can prevent an individual from living a life of pain and suffering, then it is morally acceptable for her to do so. The second and third premise state that (1) In a case where a mother is in a situation in which she can prevent her unborn child from living a life of pain and suffering, by having an abortion (2) Therefore, it is morally acceptable for a mother to have an abortion. In explaining my argument I will give an example that supports the second and third premise. If a mother is in a situation in which she becomes aware that her unborn child has an extremely painful and incurable disease called Epidermolysis Bullosa, EB. This disease causes skin to blister on the slightest touch. many infants that are born with this disease are are con? ned to wearing bandages at all times and can not even with stand their own parents touching them. In this case then it is ok for that mother to have an abortion. This act is ok because if the child is born with a disease that is incurable and painful then that child will be in will suffer for their whole lifetime and in many cases live a very short life. Therefore if a mother is in a situation in which she is able to prevent her unborn child from living a life of pain and suffering then it is morally acceptable for her to have an abortion. Rule two states that the argument must have a pattern such that if the premises are true, then the conclusion must follow. 1. ) If P, then Q 2. ) P 3. ) Therefore, Q 1. ) If P (a person is in a situation in which she can prevent an individual from living a life of pain and suffering), then Q (it is morally acceptable for her to do so. ) 2. ) P (In a case where a mother is in a situation in which she can prevent her unborn child from living a life of pain and suffering, by having an abortion), 3.) Therefore, Q (in some cases it is morally acceptable for a mother to have an abortion. ) IV. Objection An objection that may arise from premise one is that if a person is in a situation in which they sacri? ce their own life to prevent pain and suffering of another individual, then it is not morally acceptable for them to do so. An example of this is if Peter is in a situation in which he can take the place of a person in solitary con? nement, which causes psychological pain and suffering, it is not morally acceptable for him to do so. It is not morally acceptable because although the individual is suffering they knowingly participated in the act that resulted in the pain and suffering. This example expresses a violation of rule two because the argument does not follow a pattern in which the conclusion follows. Another objection that may arise from premise one is if a mother is in a situation in which she can violate the right to life of another person, the fetus, and the fetus is not threatening the mothers life, then it is morally wrong for the mother to violate the fetus’ right to life. My response to this argument is that although the mother’s life is not in danger by having the fetus, after the fetus is born they will live a short and extremely difficult life. This example is a violation of rule two because the premises are not reasonable to believe. V. Conclusion When thinking about the situation previously stated in the paper, I thought about the many options that could be presented when confronted with information, such as the fetus has an incurable and highly painful disease. By weighing the pros and cons of each principle I was able to construct my principle that was stated above. While writing this paper I have changed my general principle by adding the word â€Å"suffering. † By adding this one word I believe that it changes the argument by including another aspect that can make a life unbearable. When ? rst thinking about the reasoning behind my paper I thought about all view points that I could take, but I was able to stay true to my original belief of pro-choice by creating an argument that supports one aspect of the abortion debate.